Gold Open Access

Science teacher mentors’ perceptions of actual and preferred school conditions for mentoring student teachers to effectively use learning technology

Alois Matorevhu(1Mail),
(1) Mutare Teachers’ College, 81 Chimanimani Road, Mutare, Zimbabwe

Mail Corresponding Author

Abstract


In Zimbabwe teachers’ colleges diploma in science education student teachers go for Attachment Teaching Practice (ATP) in the second year of the three year diploma. Among others during ATP, science teacher mentors assist student teachers to develop skills in using instruction anchored on learning technology This study sought to find out the nature of science teacher mentors’ perceptions of actual and preferred school conditions involved in mentoring student teachers to effectively use learning technology A questionnaire was used to collect both qualitative and quantitative data. Results indicate that school conditions like high workload, large classes, congested timetables, lack of learning/teaching resources and nature of appraisal system, reduce effectiveness, of mentoring, hence compromising the quality of science teacher preparation. The potential of science teacher mentors could be enhanced by creating an enabling work environment, through meeting mentor needs.


Keywords


teacher mentors; ATP; actual school conditions; preferred school conditions;

   

Article DOI



DOI: https://doi.org/10.33122/ejeset.v3i2.94
       

Article Metrics

 Abstract views : 154 
 PDF views : 105 


   

Article Pages


Pages: 43-49

   

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arnold, R. S., Padilla, J. M. and Tunhikorn, B. (2009). The Development of Pre-service Science Teachers’ Professional Knowledge in utilizing ICT to support Professional Lives. Eurusia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 5(2), 91-101.

Austin, J. R. (2018). Take a Researcher to Lunch: Informal Mentoring for Researchers. Journal of Music Teacher Education. 28(1), 6-9.

Aydin, B. and Kecik, I. (2011) Achieving the Impossible? Teaching Practice component of a Pre-service Distance English Language Teacher Training Program in Turkey. Australian Journal of Teacher Education. 36 (4) 73-84

Baran, E., Bilici, C. S., Sari, A. A., and Tondeur, J. (2019). Investigating the of teacher education strategies on preservice teachers’ TPACK. British Journal of Educational Technology. 50(1), 357-370.

Best, W.B. and Kahn, J. V. (1993). Research in Education. Needham Heights: Allyn and Bacon.

Bowora, C. L. and Mpofu, A. D. (1995). Managing Schools. Harare: University of Zimbabwe, Centre for Distance Education.

Cantu, A. D. (2000). Technology Integration in Pre – service History Teacher Education. JAHC. 3(2), 1-19.

Chakanyuka, S.C. (1996). Leadership and Organizational Effectiveness. Harare: University of Zimbabwe, Centre for Distance Education.

Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and Education. New York: Macmillan. Available online at https://archive.org/details/democracyeducati1916dewe/page/6 accessed on 7 March 2019

Engels, E. D. (1993). The Quality of Science Education: The Context of Teacher Training. Amsterdam: AUA.

Fraser, B. J. and Walberg, H. H. (1995). Improving Science Education. Chicago: The National Society for the study of Education.

Fullan, G. M. and Hargress, A. (1991). What’s worth fighting for? Working together for your school: Victoria: Council for Education Administration.

Garza, R., Reynosa, R., Wermer, P., Duchaine, E., and Harter, R. A. (2019). Developing a Mentoring Framework through the Examination of Mentoring Paradigms in Teacher Residency Program. Australian Journal of Teacher Education. 44(3), 1-22.

Gut, D. M., Beam, P. C., Henning, J. E., Cochran, D., and Knight, R. T. (2014). Teachers’ Perceptions of their Mentoring Role in Three Different Clinical Settings: Student Teaching, Early Field Experiences, and Entry Year Teaching. Mentoring and Tutoring: Partnership in Learning. 22(3), 240-263.

Gökҫearslan, Ş. Kafdemir, T and Korucu, T. A. (2017). Preservice Teachers’ Level of Web Pedagogical Content Knowledge: Assessment by Individual Innovativeness. Journal of Educational Computing Research. 55(1), 70-94.

Hudson, P and Hudson, S. (2010). Mentor educators’ understandings of mentoring preservice primary teachers. International Journal of Learning. 17(2), 157-170.

Hudson, P. B., Usak, M., and Savran-Gencer, A. (2009). Employing the five-factor mentoring instrument: analysing mentoring practices for teaching primary science. European Journal of Teacher Education. 32(1), 63-74.

Hord, M. S. (2000). Staff Development and Change Process: Cut from the same cloth. Austin: Southwest Education Development Laboratory.

Koҫ, M. (2005). Implications of Learning Theories for Effective Technology Integration and Pre-service Teacher Training: A Critical Literature Review. Journal of Turkish Science Education. 2(1), 2-18.

Mtetwa, D. K. J, Chipangura, A. T, Kwari, R. and Makamure, R. (2002). Teachers assisting teachers: To what extent can resource teachers in Zimbabwean schools’ mentor their peers? SAARMSTE Proceedings: Durban, University of Natal.

Mushayikwa, E. (2000). Effective Schools. Harare: University of Zimbabwe, SEITT.

Nurcan, C. and Mustafa, C. (2015). The Challenges Faced by Preservice Science Tearchers during Teaching Practice. The Eursia Proceedings of Educational & Social Sciences. 2, 40-42.

Ota, C. C. (1995). Staff Development in Education in Zimbabwe: Concepts, Theory and Practice. Harare: Research, Evaluation Training and Materials Development Associates.

Payne, K. A. (2018). Democratic Teachers Mentoring Novice Teachers: Enacting Democratic Practices and Pedagogy in Teacher Education. Action in Teacher Education. 40(2), 133-150.

Rosdy, W. A. W. and Ghavifekr, S. (2015). Teaching and Learning with Technology: Effectiveness of ICT Integration in Schools. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 1(2), 175-191.

Schneider, R. (2008). Mentoring New Mentors: Learning to Mentor Preservice Science Teachers.Journal of Science Teacher Education. 19 (2): 113-116

Sergiovani, T. J. and Sarrat, J .R. (1993). Supervision.: A Redefinition. Singapore: McGraw-Hill Book Co. Inc.

Tambo, E. M. Z. (2000). Assessing A- Level Biology Laboratory Environments in Zimbabwean Secondary Schools: SAARSME Proceedings. University of Port Elizaberth: SAARSME

Türkmen, H. (2007). Exploring Turkish Pre-service Science Education Teachers’ Understanding of Educational Technology and Use. Research in Comparative and International Education. 2(2), 162-171.

U. S. Department of Education. (2016). Advancing Educational Technology in Teacher Preparation: Policy Brief.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Alois Matorevhu

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.