
(2) Deni Luvi Jayanto

*Corresponding author
AbstractThis research aims to evaluate the usability level of online doctor consultation features in three popular digital health applications in Indonesia, namely Halodoc, Good Doctor, and Alodokter. The method used is a descriptive quantitative approach with the System Usability Scale (SUS) instrument. A total of 45 respondents were selected purposively and asked to try each application, then provide assessments through the SUS questionnaire. The research results show that Good Doctor obtained the highest average score of 83.56 (Grade A), followed by Alodokter with a score of 81.33 (Grade A), and Halodoc with 77.89 (Grade B+). These findings indicate that Good Doctor and Alodokter have excellent usability levels, while Halodoc is categorized as good but still requires improvement, particularly in aspects of learnability and error recovery. An alysis was also conducted using additional approaches such as percentile ranking, grade categories, acceptability ranges, and Net Promoter Score (NPS). The results of this study emphasize the importance of user-centered design in developing digital health services and support the use of SUS as a practical and reliable evaluation tool. These findings are expected to provide input for application developers in improving service quality and user satisfaction.
KeywordsSystem Usability Scale (SUS); Digital Health Applications; Online Doctor Consultation; Usability; User-Centered Design
|
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.33122/ejeset.v6i1.800 |
Article metricsAbstract views : 295 |
Cite |
References
Albert, B., & Tullis, T. (2013). Measuring the User Experience: Collecting, Analyzing, and Presenting Usability Metrics. Morgan Kaufmann. Retrieved from https://books.google.co.id/books?id=bPhLeMBLEkAC
Amanda, G., & Layman, C. (2022). Examining the Intention to Use Mobile Health Applications Amongst Indonesians. Milestone: Journal of Strategic Management, 2, 103. http://doi.org/10.19166/ms.v2i2.5924
Brooke, J. (1995). SUS: A quick and dirty usability scale. Usability Eval. Ind., 189.
Georgsson, M., & Staggers, N. (2016). Quantifying usability: An evaluation of a diabetes mHealth system on effectiveness, efficiency, and satisfaction metrics with associated user characteristics. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 23, 5–11. http://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocv099
ISO, & 9241-11. (2018). International Standard Usability : Definitions and concepts iTeh Standard Iteh Standard Preview. Retrieved from https://cdn.standards.iteh.ai/samples/63500/33c267a5a7564f298f02bbd65721a181/ISO-9241-11-2018.pdf
Kruse, C., Karem, P., Shifflett, K., Vegi, L., Ravi, K., & Brooks, M. (2016). Evaluating barriers to adopting Telemedicine worldwide: A systematic review. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 24. http://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X16674087
Lewis, J. (2018). The System Usability Scale: Past, Present, and Future. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 1–14. http://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2018.1455307
Lewis, J., & Sauro, J. (2016). Quantifying the User Experience (2nd ed.).
Nielsen, J. (1994). Usability Engineering. Elsevier Science. Retrieved from https://books.google.co.id/books?id=95As2OF67f0C
Peres, S., Pham, T., & Phillips, R. (2013). Validation of the System Usability Scale (SUS). Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 57, 192–196. http://doi.org/10.1177/1541931213571043
Reed, M., Huang, J., Graetz, I., Lee, C., Muelly, E., Kennedy, C., & Kim, E. (2020). Patient Characteristics Associated With Choosing a Telemedicine Visit vs Office Visit With the Same Primary Care Clinicians. JAMA Network Open, 3, e205873. http://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.5873
Sauro, J. (2011). A Practical Guide to the System Usability Scale: Background, Benchmarks & Best Practices. Measuring Usability LLC. Retrieved from https://books.google.co.id/books?id=BL0kKQEACAAJ
WHO. (2021). Global strategy on digital health 2020-2025. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2021. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO. Retrieved from http//apps.who.int/iris
Wildenbos, G. A., Peute, L., & Jaspers, M. (2018). Aging barriers influencing mobile health usability for older adults: A literature based framework (MOLD-US). International Journal of Medical Informatics, 114. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.03.012
Zhang, J., & Walji, M. (2011). TURF: toward a unified framework of EHR usability. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 44, 1056–1067. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2011.08.005
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 Roma Firmansyah, Deni Luvi Jayanto

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

























