Article Open Access

Navigating Curricular Mandates in Peripheral Classrooms: Teachers’ Perceptions of Curriculum 2013 Implementation in Rural Indonesian Schools

(1) * M Mursalin Mail (Department of Mathematics Education, Universitas Malikussaleh, Aceh Utara, 24355, Indonesia)
(2) Mutia Fonna Mail (Department of Teacher Professional Education, Universitas Malikussaleh, Aceh Utara, 24355, Indonesia)
(3) Ferri Safriwardy Mail (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Universitas Malikussaleh, Aceh Utara, 24355, Indonesia)
(4) Fidyati Fidyati Mail (Department of Architectural Engineering, Universitas Malikussaleh, Aceh Utara, 24355, Indonesia)
(5) Iryana Muhammad Mail (Department of Mathematics Education, Universitas Malikussaleh, Aceh Utara, 24355)
(6) Muhammad Ali Mail (Department of Communication Studies, Universitas Malikussaleh, Aceh Utara, 24355, Indonesia)
*Corresponding author

Abstract


Curriculum reform in developing countries frequently encounters substantial implementation gaps, particularly in geographically and socioeconomically peripheral settings. Indonesia’s Curriculum 2013 (Kurikulum 2013, K-13) introduced sweeping pedagogical changes, mandating student-centered learning, integrated thematic instruction, and competency-based assessment across the national school system. Yet the lived experiences of teachers working in rural schools as they navigate these policy demands remain insufficiently examined in the existing literature. This study investigates how teachers in rural Indonesian schools perceive the implementation of Curriculum 2013, exploring the specific challenges they encounter, the adaptive strategies they develop, and the ways in which rural school conditions mediate instructional practice. Employing a descriptive qualitative approach, the study was conducted across four rural primary and junior secondary schools in a peripheral district of Aceh Province, Indonesia. Data were generated through semi-structured interviews with fifteen teachers, non-participant classroom observations, field notes, and curriculum document analysis over six months of fieldwork. Thematic analysis following the framework of Miles, Huberman, and Saldana (2014) was applied to identify recurring patterns across participants. Findings reveal that while teachers broadly affirm the philosophical intentions of Curriculum 2013, they report persistent tensions between policy expectations and the material realities of rural schooling, including inadequate facilities, constrained professional development access, and heavy administrative burdens. Teachers nonetheless demonstrate considerable adaptive ingenuity, yet systemic constraints curtail the depth of pedagogical transformation achievable under prevailing conditions. These findings carry significant implications for curriculum policy design, teacher professional development programs, and educational equity in rural contexts across Indonesia and comparable national settings.

Keywords


Curriculum 2013; rural education; teacher perceptions; curriculum implementation; educational reform

   

DOI

https://doi.org/10.33122/ejeset.v7i1.1519
      

Article metrics

Abstract views : 0 | PDF views : 0

   

Cite

   

Full Text

Download

References


Apple, M. W. (2014). Official knowledge: Democratic education in a conservative age (3rd ed.). Routledge.

Azano, A. P. (2011). The possibility of place: One teacher's use of place-based instruction for English students in a rural high school. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 26(10), 1–12.

Ball, S. J. (2012). Global education inc.: New policy networks and the neo-liberal imaginary. Routledge.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Coburn, C. E., & Penuel, W. R. (2016). Research–practice partnerships in education: Outcomes, dynamics, and open questions. Educational Researcher, 45(1), 48–54. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X16631750

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE.

Darling-Hammond, L. (2010). The flat world and education: How America's commitment to equity will determine our future. Teachers College Press.

Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2011). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (4th ed.). SAGE.

Fullan, M. (2015). The new meaning of educational change (5th ed.). Teachers College Press.

Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2012). Professional capital: Transforming teaching in every school. Teachers College Press.

Hargreaves, A., & Shirley, D. (2012). The global fourth way: The quest for educational excellence. Corwin Press.

Hiebert, J., & Morris, A. K. (2012). Teaching, rather than teachers, as a path toward improving classroom instruction. Journal of Teacher Education, 63(2), 92–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487111428328

Howley, C., & Howley, A. (2010). Poverty and school achievement in rural communities: A social-class interpretation. In K. A. Schafft & A. Y. Jackson (Eds.), Rural education for the twenty-first century (pp. 34–50). Penn State University Press.

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE.

McLaughlin, M. W. (2010). Listening and learning from the field: Tales of policy implementation and situated practice. In A. Hargreaves, A. Lieberman, M. Fullan, & D. Hopkins (Eds.), Second international handbook of educational change (pp. 209–224). Springer.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE.

Ministry of Education and Culture of Indonesia. (2013). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 81A Tahun 2013 tentang Implementasi Kurikulum. Kemdikbud.

Ornstein, A. C., & Hunkins, F. P. (2013). Curriculum: Foundations, principles, and issues (6th ed.). Pearson.

Pinar, W. F. (2012). What is curriculum theory? (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Priestley, M., Biesta, G. J. J., & Robinson, S. (2015). Teacher agency: An ecological approach. Bloomsbury Academic.

Reimers, F., & Chung, C. K. (Eds.). (2016). Teaching and learning for the twenty-first century: Educational goals, policies, and curricula from six nations. Harvard Education Press.

Remillard, J. T., & Heck, D. J. (2014). Conceptualizing the curriculum enactment problem in mathematics education. ZDM, 46(5), 703–718. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-014-0593-7

Schleicher, A. (2011). Building a high-quality teaching profession: Lessons from around the world. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264113046-en

Spillane, J. P. (2004). Standards deviation: How schools misunderstand education policy. Harvard University Press.

Timperley, H. (2011). Realizing the power of professional learning. Open University Press.

UNESCO. (2015). Education for all 2000–2015: Achievements and challenges (EFA global monitoring report). UNESCO Publishing.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Watt, H. M. G., & Richardson, P. W. (2015). Calling and career preparation: Towards cultivating purposeful teaching motivation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 47, 32–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.11.001

World Bank. (2014). Indonesia: Avoiding the trap (Indonesia development policy review). World Bank Group.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 M Mursalin, Mutia Fonna, Ferri Safriwardy, Fidyati Fidyati, Iryana Muhammad, Muhammad Ali

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0